Hi, The package is in this state since Aug 17, I think we can afford to wait a few more days for testing. So yes, please do test on Tuesday.
Cheers! Sylvain On 03/10/2020 00:41, Ivan Baldo wrote: > Hello. > The soonest I could try to check, is this Tuesday 6th 19:00 -0300, sorry. > Let me know if that's useful or too late. > Thanks! > > El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 10:22, Sylvain Beucler > (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 02/10/2020 13:51, Ivan Baldo wrote: >>> El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 06:48, Sylvain Beucler >>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 19:32, Sylvain Beucler >>>>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >>>>>> This could be due to a bug when building the 'all' and 'amd64' packages >>>>>> separately. >>>> >>>> I can reproduce the 2 debdiff-s with 'debuild -A' and 'debuild -B' >>>> respectively. >>>> >>>> I'm currently backporting fixes from 1.0.27-1~experimental3 to fix the >>>> issue, and updating our procedures to test this case in the future. >>> >>> Great, thanks a lot!!! >> >> I prepared a new package at: >> https://www.beuc.net/tmp/debian-lts/sane-backends/ >> that I plan to upload as a regression fix. >> >> (Note: sane-dll is now consistently removed, as it previously evaded >> deletion only in amd64, see #971592.) >> >> Can you test it? >> >> Cheers! >> Sylvain > > >
