Hi, On 31/08/2020 14:44, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: >> Still in this particular case, in our process the team coordinator cites >> contributors by running a heuristic-based script, and forwarding it >> verbatim to the team (and the whole Internet), so I believe this isn't a >> case where the contributor would need to learn to cope, but a case where >> public naming is error-prone and not appropriate. Hence why I replaced >> the last-committer name with package+date for missing website imports. >> >> That being said, I think the current process for reporting stalled and >> multiples claims is good enough as-is :) > > I don't understand why you think naming people and package names is ok > for stalled updates and multiple claims but not for stalled announcements. > could you please explain and make me understand?
I consider each separately and I can write a detailed rationale, but I feel out-of-place doing so (I'm not the one designing and justifying the procedures), and 10 days with no activity feels a bit long to resume this kind of thread. Cheers! Sylvain
