On 07/07/2020 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 07/07/2020 18:58, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Hi Abhijith, >> >>>> Not quite sure what you mean by this. I am assuming you mean something >>>> along the lines of it being "too intense for a DLA" but if so I don't >>>> understand what the concern is here. Isn't each of these a potentially- >>>> important security release? >>> >>> I think Emilio meant or what I assumed and replied to IRC is having >>> something like this on the top of every DLA >>> >>> - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Debian LTS Advisory XXXXX <LTS>@debian.org >>> https://www.debian.org/<LTS_link> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >>> July 06, 2020 https://www.debian.org/<LTS_link>/faq >>> - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks for the reference although this does not resolve my confusion, it >> simply refines it: what it is about this header that is "too much for the >> DLA". (Too much what?) > > I just thought it was a bit too formal, but it's no big deal. Since there > seems > to be consensus in favor of it I'll look into adding it.
I have added both the header and the security-tracker link, and verified that the result looks as expected and that ./parse-dla.pl in the website does the right thing. I see one minor issue in the header dash lines due to the inline PGP signatures, but that also affects the DSAs. Cheers, Emilio
