Hi Thijs, On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > It seems at least from my perspective that the LTS team is a loosely > defined consortium of individuals which makes sharing the embargoed > information problematic. If I have an embargoed issue I think there's > usually no problem sharing that information privately with LTS'ers, but > right now there's no clear contact point for that. > > Nor do I have a good understanding of who is working on LTS. People are > hired by the hour, so if I send something to someone personally now it may > just be that they're not working on LTS this week. There's not really a > defined "team" that I could find.
FWIW, concerning "paid contributors", we do have an alias pointing to all the people listed in http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts-details.html#who FTR it's deblts-team _AT_ freexian.com. But I also believe that this should not become an official contact point of the LTS team for embargoed issues. Maybe you could setup l...@security.debian.org alias pointing to whoever from the LTS team is willing to handle embargoed issues? Looks like Holger is interested. I am interested too. And I expect Thorsten Altenholz to also be interested. > Subscription to distros list is per individual and we can certainly > nominate people for that, but I think it also depends on a clear > definition of which DD('s) that would be. I don't know how you handle embargoed issues in the security team and if such a subscription is required to be able to prepare security updates, or if you expect to share enough information with the new private LTS contact point. Anyway, I would be OK to be subscribed there too. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150128131023.ga6...@home.ouaza.com