Hi, On Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > It seems at least from my perspective that the LTS team is a loosely > defined consortium of individuals which makes sharing the embargoed > information problematic. If I have an embargoed issue I think there's > usually no problem sharing that information privately with LTS'ers, but > right now there's no clear contact point for that.
agreed
> Nor do I have a good understanding of who is working on LTS. People are
> hired by the hour, so if I send something to someone personally now it may
> just be that they're not working on LTS this week.
I do understand how you come to think this, but at least for me this is not
true: while I do work some paid hours per month on LTS I also spent "my free
time" on both LTS and (to a lesser degree) I'mm also willing to do security
work (in "my free time") for wheezy (esp. for issues I fix in LTS first...)
So in summary: I'm available (at least for coordination) for LTS things all
the time.
But I don't want to be the single LTS person in that role...
> There's not really a
> defined "team" that I could find.
we should still fix this.
> I would start with creating such a contact point, and make it clear who's
> behind it. That makes sharing this information much more straightforward.
agreed.
> Subscription to distros list is per individual and we can certainly
> nominate people for that, but I think it also depends on a clear
> definition of which DD('s) that would be.
agreed.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
