On Tue, 27 May 2014, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:54:42PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 May 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > That's difficult to judge. If someone compiles of list of all DSAs in 
> > > > 2014
> > > > for squeeze (minus the ones which are unsupported in squeeze-lts) we can
> > > > make a rough estimation based on that.
> > > 
> > > I'll see if I can come up with something.
> > 
> > BTW, did you really mean 2014 (so that would be only a few months) or
> > did you rather mean 2013 (so that we have a full year of history to make it
> > more representative)?
> 
> The full 2013 would be even better, yes (but also involves more work)

In the mean time, Thorsten Alteholz analysed 2014:

There have been 105 DSAs until 23. May. 60 DSAs contain a new version for
Squeeze, 7 DSAs contain a line saying that squeeze is not affected.

Do you need the list of affected packages as well?

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140528063610.gb32...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com

Reply via email to