On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:54:42PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 May 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > > That's difficult to judge. If someone compiles of list of all DSAs in
> > > > > 2014
> > > > > for squeeze (minus the ones which are unsupported in squeeze-lts) we
> > > > > can
> > > > > make a rough estimation based on that.
> > > >
> > > > I'll see if I can come up with something.
> > >
> > > BTW, did you really mean 2014 (so that would be only a few months) or
> > > did you rather mean 2013 (so that we have a full year of history to make
> > > it
> > > more representative)?
> >
> > The full 2013 would be even better, yes (but also involves more work)
>
> In the mean time, Thorsten Alteholz analysed 2014:
>
> There have been 105 DSAs until 23. May. 60 DSAs contain a new version for
> Squeeze, 7 DSAs contain a line saying that squeeze is not affected.
>
> Do you need the list of affected packages as well?
Yes, please. The amount of work needed for each update varies heavily.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140528064413.ga28...@inutil.org
