On 08/21/2012 10:58 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Daniel: given live-* is a special case in a way that makes the
standard timeline of l10n work non-applicable, what about providing
them l10n with some kind of custom timeline (a bit more detailed than
"eventually") that helps them schedule their work?
hm?
first of all, the only bug we're talking about (#685445; there's no
other l10n related stuff that is not already present in testing) was
filled on 2012-08-20 20:39 UTC, the intend to NMU to fix it in testing
(eventhough it's not 'fixed' in unstable yet!) follows on 2012-08-20
21:10 UTC. i do not see any reason for this rush.
the only thing that matters to l10n is that this is taken care of and
that this Danish debconf update makes it to wheezy, which i'm confident
that it will, either way.
so, again, thanks for your concern, but we'll take it from here.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5033525d.6040...@progress-technologies.net
