On 24 May 2010 15:44, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com> wrote:
> > Given that it should include roughtly 5 times the size the the binary > image (or even more), 16MB surely isn't enough. I can't think of a way > to get a reasonable estimate of it in advance. Note, however, that you > can specify say, 'size=20%', which will use 20% of the size of your > physical memory. The default, if no size option is given, is to use up > to 50% of the physical memory. > I think something like 200% is reasonable given enough swap. tmpfs tends to be faster than real filesystem even when using disk because it is not concerned with consistence. Ensuring consistence of the on-disk state is what hinders performance of most filesystems but it is required for the filesystem to be of any use for permanent data storage. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimidm5jjt04gpna7cowz4cvt0opedt27ewp-...@mail.gmail.com
