"Serafeim Zanikolas" <s...@debian.org> writes: > Hi Nicholas, > >>> can I ask you to both let me know whether you're happy for me to change the >>> review status to completed? > >> Do you mean Salsa/github reviewers? To be honest I don't have time to >> do a full review...Sorry. > > no, I really mean this in the simplest possible way: review the 50 lines of > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adequate/-/blob/tech-notes/license-incompatibility.md
...this is much more work than 50 lines. People are going to use this instead of spending time (and extensive energy) manually checking for license compat, thus the reviewer[s] sign-off indicates that the matrix is a trusted shortcut. > and let me know if you approve of it. if you have changes to propose, either a > patch or comments here are fine > > in any case, happy to drop you off the reviewers list if that sounds too much > for you at this point I only asked for clarification about the claims you made about DEP5 as well as unpacking it a bit. If you'd like to make a note of that somewhere, feel free to. I don't have time to check the proposed compatibility matrix for correctness, I haven't checked it, so it's wrong to say that I reviewed it. Thanks, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
