Hi, just for a short confirmation:
I have a package which is licensed under CC-BY 2.0 This page [1] doesnt specifically list CC-BY 2.0 but I found this page [2] which explains why CC-BY 2.0 is not DFSG free. My question is: is the resource as [2] still reflecting the correct reasons for why CC-BY 2.0 is not DFSG free? Upstream is asking why CC-BY 2.0 is not DFSG free and I want to point them to the correct resource or give them the correct arguments. I am about to package software which is licensed under CC-BY 2.0 so it must probably go into non-free. This page [1] also doesnt talk about CC-BY 3.0 but if upstream would change the license version to 3.0 then it would be DFSG free, right? cheers, josch [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses [2] http://evan.prodromou.name/ccsummary/ccsummary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130714074457.2492.79261@hoothoot
