On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:35:53 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 21:56:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > But I wrote to them so many times, that I do not hesitate to consider > > my persuasion effort as "pestering"... > > > The problem with pestering is it's likely to be counter-productive. So > is encouraging other people to join that pestering.
Julien, it's possible that you are right. However, what else could we try to do? I am open to suggestions of alternative strategies. Do you think that we should set up a petition on http://www.petitiononline.com/ ? Could this work? Do you think that we should find a team of developers willing to clean-room re-implement an API/ABI-compatible framework under the terms of the LGPL v2.1 ? Could this be done in a not-too-long time? Something else? -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpbWpvJxZVA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature