On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 06:54:11PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Please also take into account that, in some cases, the authors of some > wesnoth-music files explicitly *refused* to release source (== their > preferred form for making modifications), and proposed, as a "solution" > to re-license under the terms of a license which does *not* have any > source-availability requirement. So, at least in those cases, their > intentions to *not* make source available is pretty clear. > See the previously cited forum threads...
I think I can stop answering your e-mail right at this point. I was not aware of these facts, as I have been working solely with the information provided on this mailing list, and I obviously do not disagree that, if the authors "explicity refused to release source", their work is blatantly non-free. Cheers, Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
