On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 02:44:44AM -0700, Chris Harshman wrote: > On Apr 14, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Paul Wise <[email protected]> wrote: > > The term "non-commercial" is open to interpretation > > I was surprised Black's (8e) doesn't define "(non-)commercial."
Black's (9e) defines "commercial use" as "a use that is connected with or furthers an ongoing profit-making activity", whereas "noncommercial use" is defined as "a use for private pleasure or business purposes that non involving the generation of income or bestowing a reward or other compensation". I would not ground any conclusions on that, though, especially after having once heard an judge ask a lawyer, in the middle of a hearing, whether he had a legal argument, rather than a lexical one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
