(on the Free platform license, I agree with you) Le lundi 28 novembre 2011 à 16:11 +0000, Simon McVittie a écrit : > I for one would be reluctant to contribute significantly to a package under > the license you propose; I'm already somewhat concerned about the AGPL, > which raises some interesting practical problems (particularly if parts > of an AGPL webapp are re-used in something that isn't a webapp).
It is stipulated in the AGPL that the specific requirement under section 13 apply only if the version of the program "supports such interaction" (typically a webapp user interaction) so if it's not a webapp I don't think it is the case; then it makes no difference if it's GPLv3 or AGPLv3. > Since I promised I'd mention DFSG-compliance-or-not: some debian-legal > regulars disagree with the ftpmasters' decision to allow AGPL software > into Debian. I personally think the AGPL is a Free license, but one with > significant practical problems. > I'm quite new on this list, can you point us to the rationale behind the debate? Thanks, Hugo -- Hugo Roy im: h...@jabber.fsfe.org French Coordinator mobile: +33.6 0874 1341 The Free Software Foundation Europe works to create general understanding and support for software freedom in politics, law, business and society. Become a Fellow http://www.fsfe.org/join La Free Software Foundation Europe œuvre à la compréhension et au soutien de la liberté logicielle en politique, en droit, en économie et en société. Rejoignez la Fellowship http://www.fsfe.org/join -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1322497855.24301.5.ca...@synclavier.lan
