debian-legal  

Messages by Date

• 2018/01/11 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Philipp Klaus Krause
• 2018/01/11 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Paul Wise
• 2018/01/11 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Philipp Klaus Krause
• 2018/01/10 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Milan Kupcevic
• 2018/01/10 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Paul Wise
• 2018/01/10 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Paul Wise
• 2018/01/10 Re: Are register names and locations under copyright? Milan Kupcevic
• 2018/01/10 Are register names and locations under copyright? Philipp Klaus Krause
• 2017/12/23 Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant? Pali Rohár
• 2017/12/23 Re: Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR Osamu Aoki
• 2017/12/21 Re: Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR Paul Wise
• 2017/12/21 Re: Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR Ikeda . Yuichi
• 2017/12/12 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license John Lindgren
• 2017/12/12 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Francesco Poli
• 2017/12/12 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/12/12 Re: Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR Paul Wise
• 2017/12/12 Inquire about ECCN for Debian GNU/Linux and how to deal with revised EAR Ikeda . Yuichi
• 2017/12/11 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Ian Jackson
• 2017/12/11 Re: Preinstall slightly modified Debian on laptops for sale Ian Jackson
• 2017/12/10 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license John Lindgren
• 2017/12/10 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/12/10 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Francesco Poli
• 2017/12/10 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/12/10 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/12/08 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license John Lindgren
• 2017/12/08 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Francesco Poli
• 2017/12/07 Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/12/07 Re: Preinstall slightly modified Debian on laptops for sale Kumar Appaiah
• 2017/12/07 Re: Preinstall slightly modified Debian on laptops for sale Paul Wise
• 2017/12/07 Re: Preinstall slightly modified Debian on laptops for sale Ian Jackson
• 2017/12/07 Re: Preinstall slightly modified Debian on laptops for sale Ian Jackson
• 2017/12/07 Preinstall slightly modified Debian on laptops for sale Kumar Appaiah
• 2017/12/06 Updates to MySQL Community Edition License Jim Wright
• 2017/12/05 Pozvánka: Diskusia EE CLUB "Ako ďalej s odpadmi na Slovensku?" Dana Feketeová | Odpady-portal . sk/Energie-portal . sk/Voda-portal . sk
• 2017/11/30 Re: Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main Adam Borowski
• 2017/11/30 Re: Bug#874295: Not a bug Ben Finney
• 2017/11/30 Re: Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main Andrey Rahmatullin
• 2017/11/30 Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/30 Re: Bug#874295: Not a bug Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/29 Re: Bug#874295: Not a bug Ben Finney
• 2017/11/29 Bug#874295: Not a bug Thomas Pierson
• 2017/11/29 Re: Can we serve GFDL documentation (e.g. gcc-7-doc) on manpages.d.o? Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/29 Re: Can we serve GFDL documentation (e.g. gcc-7-doc) on manpages.d.o? Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/29 Can we serve GFDL documentation (e.g. gcc-7-doc) on manpages.d.o? Michael Stapelberg
• 2017/11/26 Re: configure.in is missing but... Eriberto Mota
• 2017/11/26 Re: French gov open license Francesco Poli
• 2017/11/26 Re: French gov open license Francesco Poli
• 2017/11/24 Re: configure.in is missing but... Paul Wise
• 2017/11/24 Re: French gov open license Ben Finney
• 2017/11/24 Re: configure.in is missing but... Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/24 configure.in is missing but... Eriberto Mota
• 2017/11/22 Re: French gov open license Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/21 Re: Freeness of vague Synopsys license Andreas Bombe
• 2017/11/21 Re: French gov open license Ben Finney
• 2017/11/21 Re: legal issues of libmusicxml Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/21 Re: French gov open license Jérémy Lal
• 2017/11/21 French gov open license Xavier
• 2017/11/21 Re: EULA vs BSL,EULA vs BSL Walter Landry
• 2017/11/21 legal issues of libmusicxml Joël Krähemann
• 2017/11/21 Re: EULA vs BSL,EULA vs BSL Debian/GNU
• 2017/11/21 Re: clementine: installs non-free plugin at runtime Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/20 Re: EULA vs BSL,EULA vs BSL Walter Landry
• 2017/11/20 Re: clementine: installs non-free plugin at runtime Anthony DeRobertis
• 2017/11/20 Re: Freeness of vague Synopsys license Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/19 Re: Freeness of vague Synopsys license Ben Finney
• 2017/11/19 Freeness of vague Synopsys license Andreas Bombe
• 2017/11/17 Re: EULA vs BSL Paul Wise
• 2017/11/17 EULA vs BSL Debian/GNU
• 2017/11/16 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Carsten Leonhardt
• 2017/11/16 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/15 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Carsten Leonhardt
• 2017/11/15 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/15 Re: Licensing of jeuclid Michael Lustfield
• 2017/11/14 Licensing of jeuclid Julien Puydt
• 2017/11/10 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Carsten Leonhardt
• 2017/11/10 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Florian Weimer
• 2017/11/09 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Carsten Leonhardt
• 2017/11/09 Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Florian Weimer
• 2017/11/09 Re: [cups-devel] CUPS License Change Coming Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• 2017/11/09 SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid Carsten Leonhardt
• 2017/11/08 Re: [cups-devel] CUPS License Change Coming Ben Finney
• 2017/11/07 Re: [cups-devel] CUPS License Change Coming Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• 2017/11/03 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Ian Jackson
• 2017/11/03 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Florian Weimer
• 2017/10/27 Re: Can a license be "DFSG approved"? Ian Jackson
• 2017/10/27 Re: Can a license be "DFSG approved"? David Seaward
• 2017/10/26 Re: Can a license be "DFSG approved"? Paul Wise
• 2017/10/26 Can a license be "DFSG approved"? David Seaward
• 2017/10/14 Re: webcamoid - MS Corp files Herbert Fortes
• 2017/10/14 Re: webcamoid - MS Corp files Francesco Poli
• 2017/10/14 Re: webcamoid - MS Corp files Herbert Fortes
• 2017/10/14 Re: webcamoid - MS Corp files Francesco Poli
• 2017/10/14 Re: webcamoid - MS Corp files Herbert Fortes
• 2017/10/14 Re: webcamoid - MS Corp files Herbert Fortes
• 2017/10/14 webcamoid - MS Corp files Herbert Fortes
• 2017/10/12 Turnitin Plagiarism Checker account available sabir shah
• 2017/09/27 Re: I am the RD of ASUS, want to confirm the Debian license Ben Finney
• 2017/09/27 Re: I am the RD of ASUS, want to confirm the Debian license Walter Landry
• 2017/09/27 I am the RD of ASUS, want to confirm the Debian license 刘欢
• 2017/09/23 Re: Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? Ole Streicher
• 2017/09/23 Re: Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? tomas
• 2017/09/23 Re: Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? Simon McVittie
• 2017/09/23 Re: Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? tomas
• 2017/09/23 Re: Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? Yanhao Mo
• 2017/09/22 Re: Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? Paul Wise
• 2017/09/22 Is there a list contains all debian packages and it's license ? Yanhao Mo
• 2017/09/20 Re: does MUSIC (cosmology package) qualify as free under DFSG? Boud Roukema
• 2017/09/20 Re: does MUSIC (cosmology package) qualify as free under DFSG? Ian Jackson
• 2017/09/20 does MUSIC (cosmology package) qualify as free under DFSG? Boud Roukema
• 2017/09/20 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Herbert Fortes
• 2017/09/20 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Ian Jackson
• 2017/09/20 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Herbert Fortes
• 2017/09/20 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Herbert Fortes
• 2017/09/20 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Ian Jackson
• 2017/09/17 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Herbert Fortes
• 2017/09/17 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Ghislain Vaillant
• 2017/09/16 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Ghislain Vaillant
• 2017/09/16 Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1 Herbert Fortes
• 2017/09/06 Re: Anki logo copyright question Julian Gilbey
• 2017/09/05 Re: Anki logo copyright question Ian Jackson
• 2017/09/04 Re: Anki logo copyright question Mike Hommey
• 2017/09/04 Re: Anki logo copyright question Ben Finney
• 2017/09/04 Anki logo copyright question Julian Gilbey
• 2017/09/03 Re: Re: KJV Bible - Crown Copyright in UK [was: Bug#338077: ITP: sword-text-kvj -- King James Version with Strongs Numbers and Morphology] Rachel Atkins
• 2017/08/30 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Chris Simpkins
• 2017/08/30 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Ian Jackson
• 2017/08/27 Re: File is BCP 78 or Simplified BSD? Lintian says BCP 78 Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/08/21 Re: Wily may be non-free Ben Finney
• 2017/08/21 Re: Wily may be non-free Jacob Adams
• 2017/08/21 Re: Wily may be non-free Ben Finney
• 2017/08/21 Wily may be non-free Jacob Adams
• 2017/08/17 Gran Evento - Administracion y Control de Neumaticos Control de Daños
• 2017/08/17 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Chris Simpkins
• 2017/08/16 Re: .ttf in source packages Ben Finney
• 2017/08/16 .ttf in source packages Jeff Epler
• 2017/08/16 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Chris Simpkins
• 2017/08/16 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Francesco Poli
• 2017/08/16 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Chris Simpkins
• 2017/08/16 Re: DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Jeff Epler
• 2017/08/15 DFSG + Hack typeface license with transition to proposed new source file build in Debian package Chris Simpkins
• 2017/08/14 Re: File is BCP 78 or Simplified BSD? Lintian says BCP 78 Ian Jackson
• 2017/08/09 File is BCP 78 or Simplified BSD? Lintian says BCP 78 Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/08/03 Re: Is Project Gutenberg License DFSG compatible Sven Joachim
• 2017/07/28 Re: OpenSSL license for new packages. Kristian Fiskerstrand
• 2017/07/28 Re: OpenSSL license for new packages. Ian Jackson
• 2017/07/28 Re: OpenSSL license for new packages. Kristian Fiskerstrand
• 2017/07/28 Re: OpenSSL license for new packages. Ian Jackson
• 2017/07/28 Re: OpenSSL license for new packages. Ian Jackson
• 2017/07/27 Re: OpenSSL license for new packages. Ben Finney
• 2017/07/27 OpenSSL license for new packages. Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital
• 2017/07/25 Re: tss2: Is it DFSG compatible Breno Leitao
• 2017/07/25 Re: tss2: Is it DFSG compatible Breno Leitao
• 2017/07/24 Re: tss2: Is it DFSG compatible Ben Finney
• 2017/07/24 Re: tss2: Is it DFSG compatible Walter Landry
• 2017/07/24 tss2: Is it DFSG compatible Breno Leitao
• 2017/07/18 Re: Do i need to purchase any License Martin Steigerwald
• 2017/07/17 Re: Do i need to purchase any License Paul Wise
• 2017/07/17 Questions regarding public-domain (well, again) Lev Lamberov
• 2017/07/17 Re: Do i need to purchase any License Walter Landry
• 2017/07/17 Do i need to purchase any License ardavan izadi
• 2017/07/16 Re: BSD license type? jpaugh
• 2017/07/16 Apache foundation moves Facebook BSD+Patents license to "Category X" Jeff Epler
• 2017/07/15 Re: Identification of two licenses Lev Lamberov
• 2017/07/14 Re: BSD license type? Ole Streicher
• 2017/07/14 Re: Identification of two licenses Ben Finney
• 2017/07/14 Re: BSD license type? Ben Finney
• 2017/07/14 Identification of two licenses Lev Lamberov
• 2017/07/13 Re: BSD license type? Ole Streicher
• 2017/07/13 Re: BSD license type? Ben Finney
• 2017/07/11 BSD license type? Ole Streicher
• 2017/07/06 Re: Model List MS Power GmbH
• 2017/07/05 Re: Cisco EIGRP patent licence and the GPLv2 licence Florian Weimer
• 2017/07/05 Re: Cisco EIGRP patent licence and the GPLv2 licence Walter Landry
• 2017/07/05 Re: Cisco EIGRP patent licence and the GPLv2 licence Paul Jakma
• 2017/07/04 Re: Cisco EIGRP patent licence and the GPLv2 licence Walter Landry
• 2017/07/04 Cisco EIGRP patent licence and the GPLv2 licence Paul Jakma
• 2017/07/04 Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Cotacao
• 2017/06/26 Open source files without copyright holder Benjamin Drung
• 2017/06/26 Re: Working with a non-public license Ian Jackson
• 2017/06/17 Re: Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause Andreas Moog
• 2017/06/17 Re: Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause Ben Finney
• 2017/06/17 Re: Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause Simon McVittie
• 2017/06/17 Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause Andreas Moog
• 2017/06/14 Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Cotacao
• 2017/06/13 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/13 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/13 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/12 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Ian Jackson
• 2017/06/10 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Paul Wise
• 2017/06/10 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/09 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/08 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Anthony DeRobertis
• 2017/06/08 Re: advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Paul Wise
• 2017/06/08 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/08 advice for free software package named almost identically to non-free software Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/06/06 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Ben Finney
• 2017/06/06 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Nicholas D Steeves
• 2017/05/31 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Ben Finney
• 2017/05/31 Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package Ian Jackson
• 2017/05/31 Re: [licence] specific licenses for backdoor-factory software Ian Jackson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages