Olive <not0read0...@yopmail.com> wrote: > If I understand it well; the amendments of the LGPL are not removable > (it is not explicitly said to be removable so by default it is not). > But It seems then that this license might in fact be incompatible with > the LPGL.
They appear to be additional permissions, so are GPL-compatible IMO. > In particular it prevents to relicence FLTK under the pure GPL > which is normally allowed by the LGPL. Rather, it would be under the GPL plus additional permissions. > Any derivative works of FLTK have > to be distributed with the additional permissions and that [...] I don't see why authors of derived works have to grant the additional permissions. Where is that requirement? Confused, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
