On Sat Apr 05 10:00, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > On 08/04/04 21:21 +0100, Matthew Johnson said ... > > On Sat Apr 05 00:06, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > > > > So if I am packaging a piece of software for Debian and the software is > > > licensed > > > under the GPL, is the above valid (and more importantly, is it enough) for > > > debian/copyright? Or is wording like the following a _must_: > > > > Yes, I would say it is. > > As in, > > Yes, including /usr/share/common-licenses in the 'license blurb' text > itself is valid?
This is what I meant. As long as the text in debian/rules unambiguously declares the licence of the program, it doesn't matter what it is. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
