On Sat Apr 05 00:06, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > I should've been a bit more explicit. > > So if I am packaging a piece of software for Debian and the software is > licensed > under the GPL, is the above valid (and more importantly, is it enough) for > debian/copyright? Or is wording like the following a _must_:
Yes, I would say it is. debian/copyright needs to give the licence status for everything in the package, so any isomorphic declaration is fine. It's just customary to copy the upstream declaration verbatim and then add clarification below. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
