Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > He answered basically that the license itself is clearly stated > (which is true), and that since it is GPL, the copyright is > unimportant and I shouldn't care.
The copyright statement, if clearly false, AFAICT means that the license statement is null, leaving the recipient with no license at all. A copyright statement is only effective if it's a statement by the copyright holder. The best way to show that is to have the license statement directly accompany a correct copyright statement in the standard format, including "Copyright", years copyright began in that work, and the correct name of the copyright holder. -- \ "I went to the museum where they had all the heads and arms | `\ from the statues that are in all the other museums." -- Steven | _o__) Wright | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
