On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Marco d'Itri wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > >One example is all the GFDL-ed stuff that got approved before > >realizing that it does not comply with the DFSG. > No, GFDL'ed stuff got approved before a few people managed to change > the DFSG by disguising that as "editorial changes".
If you refer to GR-2004-003, the DFSG were left untouched by that GR. Only the SC was edited, in order to make it more clear that the DFSG must apply to anything in main, rather than to programs only. -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpVRYWZK2xta.pgp
Description: PGP signature
