[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I disagree that this can be a good approximation, since assuming it is >would imply that DFSG-compliance bugs (almost) never happen. Indeed, they do not.
>One example is all the GFDL-ed stuff that got approved before realizing >that it does not comply with the DFSG. No, GFDL'ed stuff got approved before a few people managed to change the DFSG by disguising that as "editorial changes". -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
