Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> As far as I know, the FSF doesn't forbid anyone to use GPL with an >> OpenSSL exception. > > That's entirely possible, but you haven't provided an example which > isn't contaminated by self-interest on the part of FSF. If you can > provide such an example, there's something to discuss.
The FSF cannot change the license on code they don't own. As far as I understand, what you are looking for do not appear to be possible from a legal point of view. I'm assuming that you would regard any FSF owned code to be "contaminated" by the FSFs' self-interest. What kind of example are you looking for? /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
