Don Armstrong wrote: > You propose to create another copyleft license which is > incompatible with many other widely use copyleft licenses.
Could you please explain how it is incompatible with popular copyleft licenses? >From my understanding, even the popular ones (GPL and MPL) are incompatible with each other (GPL-derived code becomes GPL, modified MPL code stays MPL) unless the copyright holder specifically releases the software under multiple licenses. You can my code and use it in GPL and MPL code without any problems. The reverse case (going from GPL or MPL to mine) is where the incompatibilities arise, and I am fine with that. > I canot in good faith even begin to suggest that you continue and > have other people use your license. I acknowledge your reasons. However, I am not trying to make The Next Great License and impose it upon the world. Instead, this is just a way for me, an immensely insignificant person, to attain peace of mind about my immensely insignificant software which might never see the light of day. :-) Thanks for your consideration. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
