On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 17:28:39 +0000 (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: > Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, does debian-legal have any suggestions for the most appropriate > > licence for audio data which is DFSG-compatible? [...] > > I would suggest: > 1. the same licence as the rest of the software, maybe with additional > permissions for performance and recording; > 2. the MIT/Expat licence; > 3. the GPL (the definition of Programs is smart enough to cope), > maybe with additional permissions;
So far so good. > 4. the Design Science License or Free Art License (I think... note > GPL-incompatibility); I disagree with suggestion number 4. The Free Art License was previously discussed on debian-legal[1] and it was concluded that it is a poorly written license and, hence, not a choice I would recommend (even assuming it's a DFSG-free one, which I'm not sure it is...) [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/09/msg00131.html I'm not a big fan of the Design Science License, either, even though it's considered to be an acceptable choice as far as the DFSG are concerned, IIRC. -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpfQjfLITK6x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
