Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, does debian-legal have any suggestions for the most appropriate > licence for audio data which is DFSG-compatible? [...]
I would suggest: 1. the same licence as the rest of the software, maybe with additional permissions for performance and recording; 2. the MIT/Expat licence; 3. the GPL (the definition of Programs is smart enough to cope), maybe with additional permissions; 4. the Design Science License or Free Art License (I think... note GPL-incompatibility); [...] > Finally, if we were to ship the game without any levels is it still > suitable for main (I'm guessing not, since quake2 is in contrib and in a > similar case)? [...] I doubt it. It depends if it does anything useful without levels. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]