Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The clarification from MJ Ray regarding DFSG#4 made me think that each > distinct copyright holder had a veto power on _one_ Font Name. > At least I hoped it was so, since if each copyright holder can reserve > an arbitrary list of Font Names, the restriction can easily grow up to > the level it makes finding a non-reserved name nearly impossible.
I apologise in that case, for it was not my intention. It can be an arbitrary restriction on naming, as recently clarified on ofl-discuss. http://openlists.sil.org/archives/ofl-discuss/2006-December/000120.html This use of a copyright licence to try to enforce a trademark is why I think every packager of OFL'd software must beware this potential hole. I know it's not good, but it's far better than the last OFL version. Hope that explains, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
