On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:46:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:04:25AM -0800, Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > But consider for a moment that fact that iceweasel (at least the one I > > > have > > > installed) includes /usr/bin/firefox... which is a symlink to iceweasel. > > > > > > The file isn't part of the transition package, it's part of the debian > > > product. The confusion then lies not just with the transition package, > > > but > > > with the iceweasel package itself. > > > I agree it's a problem. > > Why? An executable name and a package name are both functional elements > AFAICS, and we shouldn't be worrying about trademarks for either of them > until > > - the trademark holder tells us to stop > - we get legal advice to the effect that the trademark holder has a case
I was more thinking about /usr/bin/firefox not having its place in the iceweasel package. More in the firefox package. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
