On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 10:56:27AM -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > Greetings! I'm fully aware that the opinions stated on this list have no > bearing on anything, but I would still like to ask whether anyone here > might have any ideas for improving the wording of the following license > header: > > #!bin/bash > # > # Let this be known to all concerned: It is the specific intent of the > # author of this script that any party who may have access to it always > # treat it and its contents as though it were a work to which any and all > # copyrights have expired. > # > > I thought about "s/author/sole author/" but decided against it as not > generic enough. I can see how deciding against it may make it rather > unclear as to whose intent is being expressed, but I think that would be > rather moot anyway in the event of any dispute. I now cut the ribbon > opening this to the free-for-all of opinions... >
What about: The author(s) of this script expressly place it into the public domain. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
