Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm talking about is different, each on their own free,
> licenses being deemed incompatible with each other. Examples are
> the GPL, the OpenSSL license, and the Open Software License. I find
> it hard to believe that most authors who choose to release under the
> GPL do so in order to prevent their code being used in a program
> released under the OSL.
This is, indeed, one of the main goals in the current process of
revising the GPL: to make the GPLv3 more compatible with other
licenses that grant the same freedoms to the licensee, while still
preserving those freedoms strongly.
<URL:http://gplv3.fsf.org/rationale#SECTION00380000000000000000>
--
\ "I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, |
`\ when you looked at it in the right way, did not become still |
_o__) more complicated." -- Paul Anderson |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
