Hello Ben and *,
sorry for the late reponse, but I was in Palestine and
have gotten trouble with the Israelian Authority...
(They give bullschit on Diplomatic immunity!)
Am 2006-06-12 17:37:16, schrieb Ben Finney:
> Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Since I am using Debian/main only (with the exception of libdvdcss2)
> > since more then 7 years now I want to say, that my Software any
> > Licence which comply with the DFSG.
>
> That's great, it makes the free software community stronger and makes
> your work useful to more people.
>
> > Is there allready a licence which use the term DFSG as licence?
>
> The DFSG doesn't specify license terms. It's a set of guidelines for
> judging the freedoms granted to recipients of a work. This judgement
> concerns not just the license from copyright, or patent, or trademark,
> or any other particular monopolies. Rather, it addresses the combined
> set of effective freedoms granted to the recipient of the work.
>
> Thus, it wouldn't make much sense to treat the DFSG as a license.
I was thinking to use the term:
Licence: This software is under any Licence which complay
with the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG).
I am thinking, that this makes my standpoint more clear as telling
users: "This software is under GPL vXX". I fully aggree with the
Debian philosophy and this is why I stay with it (even if it steals
me sometimes th last nerv ;-) )
What do you think about it?
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
