On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > 3. Derived Works > > The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must > allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of > the original software. (Excepting, for legal reasons, the text of > the work's license(s).)
This is basically an implied exception; if we didn't have it, we couldn't distribute anything at all.[1] [Note that this only applies to the GPL when it is serving as a licence under which a work in Debian is released. Random inclusion of the GPL otherwise is not allowed because it doesn't satisfy the DFSG.] Don Armstrong 1: There's a reason why they're Guidelines as opposed to being a Definition... [insert OSD v DFSG debate here.] -- If you have the slightest bit of intellectual integrity you cannot support the government. -- anonymous http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
