Craig Southeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:42:49 +0300 > Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:29:37PM +1000, Craig Southeren wrote: >> > On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:18:34 -0700 >> > Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > I think you have successfully argued that we can satisfy this >> > > requirement of the license, and thus we could probably legally >> > > distribute MPLed software; however, distributability only gets you as >> > > far as the non-free archive. >> > >> > Given that the Debian definition of free basically means "GPL compatible", >> > I never really expected anything else :) >> >> GPL-compatible as in openssh and openssl? > > The modified BSD license is GPL compatible, isn't it? (I know the > original BSD license isn't)
That doesn't matter. GPL-compatibility or copyleft ist *not* a requirement of the DFSG, not at all. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
