Craig Southeren wrote: > On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:18:34 -0700 > Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think the Debian CVS/SVN server meets the definition and would most >> likely satisfy the license, though it could potentially cause problems >> for our mirror operators. > > I don't see why.
Because they then depend on us to continue providing source, rather than mirroring it themselves. >> I think you have successfully argued that we can satisfy this >> requirement of the license, and thus we could probably legally >> distribute MPLed software; however, distributability only gets you as >> far as the non-free archive. > > Given that the Debian definition of free basically means "GPL compatible", > I never really expected anything else :) No, it doesn't. Debian's definition of Free provides considerably more leeway than GPL-compatibility. - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
