On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Don Armstrong: > > In any case, we've been working with the FSF to resolve these > > issues as well, so hopefully a new version of the GFDL will no > > longer posess them. > > Does this mean that there will be a new version of the GFDL, > finally, or just a different FSF-endorsed documentation license > (which would require relicensing and all the hassles that involves)?
I hope the former will happen, but the later may be more likely. Eben has publicly said that there will be a new draft of the GFDL proposed during the v3 process, but I don't know whether that will superceed the current version, or be a fork of it. That's really up to the FSF. Don Armstrong -- Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -- Jules Bean http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
