Craig Sanders wrote: > if there is a particular process which can shoehorn the document into > the limited device, then it's perfectly OK to distribute the document > along with with instructions (whether human-executable instructions or > a script/program) for doing so. i.e. this meets the requirements of the > "patch clause" in the DFSG.
No it does not, as the patch clause in DFSG 4 clearly states that "the license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code." Please either point to the provision in the GFDL that explicitly allows that, or stop claiming DFSG 4 is relevant. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
