On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:13:59PM +0400, olive wrote: > To answer, Patrick remark; a search in this list will show you that I > have considerably discussed and defended my opinion even if I do not > agree with most of the posters.
You have? You elided the bulk of Don's response wholesale, and your arguments often seem to reduce to poorly-defended assertions of what you think the DFSG should mean. And to repeat myself from a response to a previous poster making your argument, > This is just more wedging, trying to abuse the fact that Debian allows > invariant license texts to squeeze in other invariant stuff. > > I would suggest anyone engaging in such wedging carefully reevaluate > whether what they're doing is really in the best interests of Debian; > or whether they're just trying to contrive a way to pound Debian into > "agreement" with the FSF. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00493.html -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
