On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:39:34PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:28:48 +0100 Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > Btw, the latest revised license reads: > > > > c. The Contributor grants third parties the irrevocable > > right to copy, use and distribute the Contribution, with > > or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, > > provided that unauthorized redistributed modified works > > do not contain misleading author, version, name of work, > > or endorsement information. This specifically implies, > > for instance, that unauthorized redistributed modified > > works must not claim endorsement of the modified work by > > the IETF, IESG, IANA, IAB, ISOC, RFC Editor, or any > > similar organization, and remove any claims of status as > > an Internet Standard, e.g., by removing the RFC > > boilerplate. The IETF requests that any citation or > > excerpt of unmodified text reference the RFC or other > > document from which the text is derived. > > s/unauthorized redistributed/redistributed unofficial/ , I would say... > > The term "unauthorized" makes me think about a license violation, which > is not what is meant here, IIUC. Agree; I considered suggesting "not explicitly authorized". I would also suggest to remove the preface "This specifically implies, for instance, that", and just use the additional "don't imply endorsement" phrase.
-- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
