Yorick Cool wrote: [...] > The reasoning is pretty simple. As Sean said, it is based on the > understanding that the GPL is a contract.
Yeah. Except that everybody and his dog knows that the FSF's position is that GPL != contract. Moglen and RMS now call it "The Constitution" (of the GNU Republic, I suppose). http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/41227555ca18833b C'mon, the GPL drafter RMS is on record: http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/8464781e78e421cb regards, alexander.
