Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - The default build for Firefox and Thunderbird uses non-trademarked > logos
Are you sure? The graphics seem to have the words "Firefox" in them, which doesn't seem a permitted use of the trademark to me. > - The names can be found in files called brand.dtd and brand.properties > http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/find?string=browser.*brand > (for Firefox) Ah, I found another directory mozilla/dist/branding as well as the mozilla/other-licenses/branding one that I knew about. Which of these are actually used? Still the About box and about: page have Firefox graphics. Grrr. Where do they come from? > This should change the vast majority of instances. There are a few it > doesn't; these are either bugs or unavoidable due to the words being in > other pieces of code, like the installer. But try that and see how far > you get. Well, the titlebar and some of the names are now correct. I still have a browser that uses the Firefox trademark repeatedly to describe itself. Can I distribute it? Is MF implicitly licensing the trademarks by making it so hard to remove them when performing acts permitted by the copyright licence? Actually, I have no idea whether implicit trademark licences exist. I was only told about implicit patent licences last year. I'd rather not rely on that idea if I don't have to ;-) Amusingly, the "About FireWWW" box says it is copyright contributors, but pressing the credits button displays a box empty apart from "FireWWW \n The browser, reloaded". How do Mozilla contributors feel about not being credited on the About box at all? -- MJR/slef
