On 06 Jan 2005 01:30:02 GMT MJ Ray wrote: > Using MF's trademarks seems to require some sort of licence to > be granted specifically to debian and not to its users. That > seems not to follow DFSG 7 or 8, doesn't it? > > Alternatively, if the names are changed to > firebird/tbird/mozzarella or anything else avoiding the MF > trademarks, no extra licences are required. Describing the > heritage in the description line will let users find the > right debian package, while still being honest. > > If MF is really going to insist that it gets magic veto rights > over the work of the debian maintainer and users, changing > the name is the easiest solution. If MF want us to use the > trademarks, make that solution easier by relaxing the policy > enough to follow the DFSG. I think it's fine to insist on > prominent marking of differences, but it's too severe to revoke > permission based on random unspecified quality judgements.
I agree entirely.
At present, it seems we really *need* to replace MoFo trademarked names
and logos in order to satisfy the DFSG. Sad but true. :-(
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpxMfuWYJ3nJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
