* Raul Miller: >> Anyway, this isn't the case I'm really interested in. And if there's >> real source code, it should be reasonably clear that the GPL is >> impractical. > > I don't really understand this. I suspect I'm not thinking what you're > thinking "real sourced code" means.
A METAFONT program, for example. > That said, if the GPL is really a problem, and you're the copyright > holder, you could always use BSD's license. Even if I were the copyright holder, I'd rather use a copyleft license.
