On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:21:43PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Side issue #1: even a GFDL with exceptions is still going to be GPL > > incompatible. True, but that's also the case for several other > > licenses that are considered DFSG-free, so the point isn't relevant > > for this discussion. We can recommend dual licensing, but don't need > > to require it. > > It's particularly important for documentation of GPL'd works, where > being able to move code and informative text back and forth -- for > online help, for example -- is useful but made impossible by the > licensing.
I'm fine with recommending that people dual-license; as you say, it's a PITA otherwise. But incompatibility with the GPL does not cause GFDL non-freeness.
