Glenn Maynard wrote: > (Unrequested CC sent; it just seems like a good idea when sending mails > concerning possible MUA problems ...) > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:16:51PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> You haven't been reading my postings? > > I doubt anyone is reading all of your postings, due to your well-known > bad habit of spamming the list with a page of replies to old posts at a > time. I wouldn't be surprised if some people had you killfiled for it. > > This is the fourth post I see from you on this list this month, followed > by about twenty more. In this case, I am catching up on a month of postings.
And I (a) haven't said anything redundant (b) have stuck to a strict rule of no more than one message per topic > (I wouldn't bother asking this, since every time I have you've blown me > off or ignored me, as I recall; except that this response seems to > indicate that you think you've been posting My opinions on the software-patent retaliation clauses were made clear months ago during the discussion of the Apache License 2.0; I doubt that Andrew Suffield was killfiling me at that time. > even though I see almost all > of your posts *after* this one ...) -- This space intentionally left blank.
