Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 01:48:31PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 05:25:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> > > I believe the change to section 10 of the licence is sufficient to >> > > address >> > > the objection to that section in the original summary. Is there >> > > consensus on this? >> > >> > No, the clause hasn't really changed. It's still non-free for all the >> > same reasons. >> >> No, it has changed. > > Old clause: > > Any lawsuit claiming patent infringement revokes your license. > > New clause: > > Any lawsuit claiming patent infringement revokes your license. > > > Nothing's changed here.
Wrong. Please look more carefully. Old clause: If you file any lawsuit claiming *anything* infringes any patent, you lose your license to this work. New clause: If you file any lawsuit claiming *this work* infringes any patent, you lose your license to this work. Notice the difference. :-) -- This space intentionally left blank.
