I need to revist this response. > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 04:38:04PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > So, you don't need an extreme example. It's perfectly valid for one to > > take Emacs, link it against OpenSSL, and distribute binaries, as long as > > OpenSSL doesn't accompany it.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 05:15:04PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > In the U.S., at least, "linking it against OpenSSL" probably counts as > "accompanying it", even if the binaries for the OpenSSL library do not > appear on the same distribution media as the binaries for Emacs. Ok, re-reading the GPL, I was wrong about this. That said, you left some important conditions out of your "perfectly valid" statement. -- Raul
