* Sven Luther: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Sven Luther: >> >> > Still, it only applies to the not linked with GPLed Qt case, so should be >> > ignorable for us, right ? >> >> Only you if you interpret "eSvn License for Unix platforms" as a mere >> placeholder (like "Licensing Option 2"). It's not clear if Debian is >> a Unix platform. > > We don't care about that, the licence says : > > if you are linking with the GPLed version of Qt, then the code is under the > GPL. > > So, we can ignore all this non-GPLed QT and unix-plateform mess, can't we ?
I'd rather see a clarification from upstream. If they intent to prevent a GPLed Windows port, it's non-free. If they just want to make sure that people may distribute Windows binaries, it's probably okay.
