On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 09:55 -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> But a requirement that I provide permissions over-and-above the > freedoms I had is non-free. Do you believe that this is non-free because of philosophical reasons, or because DFSG 3 says so? I recognise that this is what DFSG 3 appears to claim, but on re-reading the debian-private thread which shaped the social contract I'm becoming increasingly convinced that that's not its intention. I'd be interested to hear arguments for why DFSG 3 /should/ mean what it appears to mean. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
