On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:28:16AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:29:24PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > I don't see how this makes it non-free. You are distributing under the > > > same license you received the software under, so DFSG 3 is satisfied, > > But you're not. The license permissions you received don't permit using > the code under a completely difference license; for example, you can't > link the code with GPL work, since the licenses are incompatible. However, > you have to distribute your modifications under terms that *do* allow the > original programmer to do so. The license terms you're forced to release > modifications under are different from the ones you received.
But if upstreqm incorporqtes your changes, thus creating a modification of your QPLed work, you have the same right as he has, don't you ? Friendly, Sven Luther
