On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:35:03 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote: > I strongly disagree that such clauses are non-free.
I still consider QPL 3b as non-free: I'm not allowed to redistribute modifications under the same terms of the original software. At least not to the initial developer. This, IMHO, violates DFSG 3. See my previous message Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01736.html) and the subthread that followed. Brian Thomas Sniffen is following the same line of reasoning now in this thread. -- | GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | $ fortune Francesco | Key fingerprint = | Q: What is purple Poli | C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 | and commutes? | 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 | A: A boolean grape.
pgpHssmo1fzle.pgp
Description: PGP signature